Demonstrate your thinking about the major ideas presented in class and in the course readings;(2) present a claim supported by examples from your personal experience.

The following questions ask you to consider your Social Agency-how certain factors, such as culture, beliefs, opinions, knowledge, and environment, influence your ability to think, create and evaluate information effectively.Ensure you have reviewed the assigned course readings. Think about the questions before you respond to them and consider how key ideas presented in the course so far can inform your responses.Your answers should take the form of arguments that(1) demonstrate your thinking about the major ideas presented in class and in the course readings;(2) present a claim supported by examples from your personal experience. Each response should be between 150-200 words and your writing (language, reasoning, organization of ideas, and tone) should be appropriate for a professional audience that does not know you.*Answer each question separately.*Respond in the first person (Use I and avoid the general use of you, one, society or people and things).Answer those three questions(150-200 per question):1. What is a “good” idea? Imagine you are speaking to a professional audience that does not know you. Explain by establishing your criteria for a good idea and by giving a concrete example.2. According to Nick Crossley, “Social agents are able, reflexively, to recognize that their way of seeing and thinking about the world is derived from a social structure (a discourse) that they have learnt and that they habitually rely on” (61). According to Spector and Damon, “a discourse community is a group of people that develops a sense of identity through the writing of and for its members” (12).What artist, designer, creative professional or discourse community has influenced your academic interests or your creative work? What is it about their ideas that influence you? Be specific.3. Following through on John Ruskin’s ideas, Mike Sharples states, “…there can be no ideal view of the world, free of perception, only different ones. There is no single truth for a reader to unpack from the text” (156).How do you know what you know is true? Who or what do you define as a credible source? How do you determine or verify their credibility?