Systematic reviews are the pillars of evidence-based health care and are secondary research, which is the development of a study based upon prior research. Researchers compile studies into one review and conduct a thorough analysis of an issue. These reviews allow researchers to judge the quality of studies and make suggestions after replicating the research methods used. This method of research is popular in the health care industry because it identifies solutions to complex issues, increases accuracy, and resolves discrepancies.Read the open-access article assigned to your team using the link provided in the Ch. 29 toolkit. See team assignment below:Li, Z. Z., Li, Y., Lei, X., Zhang, D., Liu, L., Tang, S., & Chen, L. (2014). Prevalence of suicidal ideation in Chinese college students: A meta-analysis. PLoS One, 9, e104368.Utilize the resources in the Chapter 29 Systematic Reviews of Research Evidence: Meta-Analysis, Meta-synthesis, and Mixed Studies Review toolkit as a guide to completing your systematic review critique. Box 29.1 in the toolkit provides critiquing guidelines.Prepare an 8- to 12-slide presentation using Microsoft® PowerPoint® or a presentation tool of your choice summarizing your findings.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your team\’s presentation individually. **For turnitin reports, copy and paste your slide and speaker notes into a word document to submit to the plagiarism checker.**All presentations should have a Turnitin report under 15% or a penalty will be deducted (25%) per the plagiarism email in the Instructor\’s announcement. If papers have greater than 50%, the assignment will receive a \”0\”.Any papers that do not have a reference page, are not cited in the paper, contains direct quotes, or uses first person will automatically have 10 points deducted.