ENG Research argumentative Paper Outline with Guided Notes all peer reviewed sources due along with Introduction please follow the direction below I need to work with you throughout the paper also my main point for each body i wanted to include if the kids were ADHD, Gifted or OVerexcitabilies
I. Introduction (1-2 pages)
A. [Capture the readers interest. DO NOT QUOTE A DICTIONARY!]
B. [Introduce Background Information: WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY, HOW of issue]
a. Issue first established when
b. Pioneers in field were
c. Problem initially treated as/dealt with by
d. Issue is still a problem because
C. [Thesis Statement: This issue should be resolved by doing X things OR X is the most appropriate course of action.]
II. [Body I: Logical Support Points for thesis] (4-6 pages)worry about the outline we will work on the pages later
A. [Support using your own words in a topic sentence]
1. [Example: Introduction of author/text, quote or paraphrase (Authors Last Name, date).]
a. [Explanation of quote/paraphrase (how does this evidence support your thesis?)]
2. [Example: Introduction of author/text, quote or paraphrase (Authors Last Name, date).]
a. [Explanation of quote/paraphrase (how does this evidence support your thesis?)]
B. [Support using your own words in a topic sentence]
1. [Example]
a. Explanation
2. [Example]
a. Explanation
C. [Support using your own words in a topic sentence]
1. [Example]
a. [Explanation]
2. [Example]
a. [Explanation]
III. [Body II: Logical Supporting Points for Thesis continued] (4-6 pages)worry about the outline we will work on the pages later
A. [Support]
1. [Example]
2. [Example]
B. [Support]
1. [Example]
2. [Example]
C. [Support]
1. [Example]
2. [Example]
IV. [Opposing Viewpoints: Other Opinions AND Why Theyre Wrong] (4-5 pages pages) worry about the outline we will work on the pages later
A. [Opposing Viewpoint: Others have seen this issue differently. They suggest that]
1. [Example of opposing rhetoric, cited.]
a. [Explanation: They base this belief on the idea that]
2. [Refutation: This reasoning is flawed because]
B. [Opposing Viewpoint: Still others contend that]
1. [Example]
a. [Explanation]
2. [Refutation]
C. [Opposing Viewpoint: Another group has postured that
1. [Example]
a. [Explanation]
2. [Example]
V. Conclusion
A. Restate thesis using different words. Do not use this section to summarize your paper. We just read it. Instead, reflect on what your ideas would look like, properly executed, and conversely, how the future looks if it continues on a trajectory excluding your ideas. You can refer to the ideas you mentioned, but dont write out a list of things you just talked about. The Abstract is a better place for a summary.
B. [Revisit introduction or tie all ideas together]
