philosophical analysis of a POLITICAL ARGUMENT/DEBATE or a COMMERCIAL containing fallacies

Write a 1-2 page philosophical analysis of a POLITICAL ARGUMENT/DEBATE or a COMMERCIAL containing fallacies. The choice is yours. BRIEFLY summarize the argument or debate IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Identify the FALLACIES used and NAME THEM. Evaluate the use of fallacies in your concluding paragraph and state why you think the argument or debate was effective (or not). Your paper should be NO MORE THAN 2 PAGES OF CONTENT, include in-text citations referencing your source and a works cited page, and be formatted in MLA (Modern Language Association) style.

Here are 14 fallacies to help you out!
Hasty generalization
Ad Hominem Attack
Appeal to Emotion
Appeal to Tradition
False Analogy
Two Wrongs
Post hoc ergo propter
Straw man
False dilemma
Slippery slope
Wrong authority
Non sequitur
Circular reasoning
Avoiding the question