Note for the Writer: Please make sure that I get assignment on time as I cannot provide any extension and make sure it is of best quality and no further corrections needed.
PDE Final Assignment 2016 Second Individual Assignment (45%): due 9am, 29th October, 2016 Assignment formatting requirements:
? Times New Roman;
? Size 12;
? 1.5 spacing (1.5 spacing does not apply to tables and figures);
? with 2.5cm margin
Final assignment must include the following in the suggested sequence:
Cover page (refer to required details in the next page);
Project aims, objectives and strategies (these could be very similar between group members)
Key personnel (without budget details);
Key project stakeholders to be consulted and informed during the project planning, implementation and evaluation process;
Project sustainability consideration;
Table in Landscape format: Project strategies and relevant activities with detailed timeframe and allocated responsibilities (use template provided);
Table in landscape format: detailed design of process evaluation (use template provided);
Table in landscape format: detailed design of impact evaluation (use template provided);
Outline of assignment
Cover Page:
Project Title
Author Name (student number)
Target population and geographic coverage
Timeframe of the project
Estimated budget
New page (s)
Project overview (no more than 150 words) (describe what the overall project is about);
Project Aim;
Project Objectives (four to six objectives);
Project Strategies (five to seven strategies);
Project key personnel (those who will manage or be involved in the implementation of the project);
Key project stakeholders (those groups or organisations who should be consulted and informed during the project planning, implementation and evaluation process);
Project sustainability consideration (no more than 300 words) (details actions/strategies that you have built in the project design in order to sustain the project benefits)
New page (s): Project Strategies (up to seven key strategies, simply copy what you developed The cover page) and key activities with timeline and responsible person/position New page (s): Process Evaluation
New page (s): Impact Evaluation
Detailing the evaluation questions, methods for measurement and information/data collection, responsible persons, and associating timeframes;
Please use the template provided. You can fit majority of the information in the table for both process and impact evaluation. However, you may need explanations on specific details which may include after the table.
Project Strategies vs. Activities table:
Strategies Key Activities Timeframe for each activity Positions involved Responsible person
Project Process Evaluation Table:
key evaluation questions Indicators of achievements/Success indicators Methods for measurement including details of data collection When will the information be collected Responsible person
Impact Evaluation Table:
Objectives Indicators of achievements / Success indicators Methods for Measurements including details of data collection When should data collection and analysis take place? Responsible person
Key components required and marks distribution :
Overall presentation 3%
5%
The assignment has been developed and presented in a professional manner and met all necessary formatting requirements
(3) Well written with no grammatical and spelling errors
(5)
Overall writing quality: 3 marks
Any one grammatical or spelling error will result in the losing of 0.5 marks to a maximum of 2 marks.
Cover Page
1.5% If all required details are included, 1.5 marks will be given. (No marks will be given if there are any missing information)
Second Page
1.5% Project overview (no more than 150 words)
1% Project Aim
3% Project Objectives (four to six objectives)
5% Project Strategies (five to seven objectives)
Required Project Details
22.5% Relevant activities with detailed timeframe and allocated responsibilities and responsible person/position are provides for each of the listed strategies
Comprehensiveness & accuracy of relevant activities for all strategies: 15 marks.
Comprehensiveness & accuracy of timeframe for all activities: 5 marks.
Comprehensiveness & accuracy of responsible persons: 2.5 marks.
30% Process Evaluation Table
All relevant and key evaluation questions have been correctly written and included in the required template: 5 marks
Indicators for all evaluation questions are well defined: 10 marks.
Sources and methods for tracking the indicators are clear and comprehensive: 10 marks
Timeline for data collection is correctly provided to each types of the information/data: 2.5 marks Responsible person for the data collection is clearly identified: 2.5 marks
22.5% Impact Evaluation Table
Comprehensiveness and accuracy of indicators for all objectives: 6 marks
Comprehensiveness and accuracy of sources for of all indicators: 4 marks
Comprehensiveness and accuracy of methods used for measuring the indicators and timeline for the measurement and analysis: 10 marks
Responsible person for the data collection is clearly identified: 2.5 marks
2% Sustainability consideration (no more than 300 words)
1.5% Project key personnel are correctly listed (those who will manage or be involved in the implementation of the project);
1.5% Key project stakeholders are correctly listed (those groups or organisations who should be consulted and informed during the project planning, implementation and evaluation process);
